Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Fabricating Terror

We are deeply saddened by news of our brother's arrest.... at the end of the day, as everyone scrambles around to figure out who or what radicalized him, we would just like to point people in the direction of actual US intervention in Somalia and throughout the Muslim world. Here is a reality that people should think about: America continues to plunge forward into its War on Terror and we all hear the argument that Americans are really good people who care so much about the world yet, when Wikileaks documents reveal genocide, international crimes, and other atrocities generally Americans are silent (minus a small progressive community) after a few days.... The law enforcement agencies certainly helped to create this plot and certainly will generate support for their gestapo-like police state with it. However, the reality is that terror threats evolve and rather than preventing attacks against civilians, this policy of entrapment will only create more animosity. Neglecting to end the wars will only create more animosity. Ignoring the legitimate grievances of the "terrorists" will only create more animosity and eventually something very serious is going to happen again in America.  I don't condone attacks like these, I also don't think we should condemn them until Americans are ready willing and able to condemn the thousands of civilians killed each month by American soldiers throughout the world. Unfortunately, most Western Muslims are all too quick to condemn and attack their brother. Fortunately, many non-Muslim Americans are willing to probe a little deeper, give it some thought and understand that the long term ramifications of such practices are far more severe than folding up the empire, coming home, and ending Terrorism abroad. Here is to more Americans taking a stance against terrorism, in this case their own. You know what they say, "America First..."  If American terrorists take a stand I am sure the Muslim terrorists will follow.


By Paul Craig Roberts
November 30, 2010 "Information Clearing House" -- Why does the FBI orchestrate fake terror plots?

The latest one snared Osman Mohamud, a Somali-American teenager in Portland, Oregon. The Associated Press report by William Mall and Nedra Pickler (11-27-10) is headlined in Yahoo News: “Somali-born teen plotted car-bombing in Oregon.”

This is a misleading headline as the report makes it clear that it was a plot orchestrated by federal agents. Two sentences into the news report we have this: “The bomb was an elaborate fake supplied by the [FBI] agents and the public was never in danger, authorities said.”

The teenager was supplied with a fake bomb and a fake detonator.

Three sentences later the reporters contradict the quoted authorities with a quote from Arthur Balizan, special agent in charge of the FBI in Oregon: “The threat was very real.”

The reporters then contradict Balizan: “White House spokesman Nick Shapiro said Saturday that president Barack Obama was aware of the FBI operation before Friday’s arrest. Shapiro said Obama was assured that the FBI was in full control of the operation and that the public was not in danger.”

Then Shapiro contradicts himself by declaring: “The events of the past 24 hours underscore the necessity of remaining vigilant against terrorism here and abroad.”

The story arrives at its Kafka highpoint when President Obama thanks the FBI for its diligence in saving us from the fake plot the FBI had fabricated.

After vacillating between whether they are reporting a real plot or a orchestrated one, the reporters finally come down on the side of orchestration. Documents released by US Attorney Dwight Holton “show the sting operation began in June.” Obviously, the targeted Portland teenager was not hot to trot. The FBI had to work on him for six months. The reporters compare “the Portland sting” to the recent arrest in Virginia of Faroque Ahmed who was ensnared in a “bombing plot that was a ruse conducted over the past six months by federal officials.”

Think about this. The FBI did a year’s work in order to convince two people to participate in fake plots.

If you are not too bright and some tough looking guys accost you and tell you that they are Al Qaeda and expect your help in a terrorist operation, you might be afraid to say no, or you might be thrilled to be part of a blowback against an American population that is indifferent to their government’s slaughter of people of your ethnicity in your country of origin. Whichever way it falls, it is unlikely the ensnared person would ever have done anything beyond talk had the FBI not organized them into action. In other cases the FBI entices people with money to participate in its fake plots.

Since 9/11, the only domestic “terrorist plot” that I recall that was not obviously organized by the FBI is the “Times Square plot” to which Faisal Shahzad pleaded guilty to trying to set off a car bomb in Manhattan. This plot, too, is suspicious. One would think that a real terrorist would have a real bomb, not a smoke bomb.

In his May 19, 2009 article (reprinted Nov. 27, 2010), Joe Quinn collects some of the fake plots, some of which were validated by torture confessions and others by ignorant and fearful juries. The US government comes up with a plot, an accused, and tortures him until he confesses, or the government fabricates a case and takes it to jurors who know that they cannot face their neighbors if they let off a media-declared “terrorist.”

Perhaps the most obvious of these cases is “the Miami seven,” a hapless group of Christian-Zionist-Muslims that called themselves the “Sea of David” and were quietly living in a Florida warehouse awaiting biblical end times. Along came the FBI posing as Al Qaeda and offered them $50,000 and an Al Qaeda swearing-in ceremony.

The FBI told them that they needed to blow up the Sears Tower in Chicago and various government buildings. An honest reporter at Knight Ridder revealed: “The Justice (sic) Department unveiled the arrests with an orchestrated series of news conferences in two cities, but the severity of the charges compared with the seemingly amateurish nature of the group raised concerns among civil libertarians,” who noted that the group had “no weapons, no explosives.”

The Justice (sic) Department and tamed media made a big show out of the “militaristic boots” worn by the hapless “plotters,” but the FBI had bought the boots for them.

The biggest piece of evidence against the hapless group was that they had taken photos of “targets” in Florida, but the US government had equipped them with cameras.

The US government even rented cars for its dupes to drive to take the pictures.

It turns out that the group only wanted the $50,000, but an American jury convicted them anyhow.

When the US government has to go to such lengths to create “terrorists” out of hapless people, an undeclared agenda is being served. What could this agenda be?

The answer is many agendas. One agenda is to justify wars of aggression that are war crimes under the Nuremberg standard created by the US government itself. One way to avoid war crimes charges is to create acts of terrorism that justify the naked aggressions against “terrorist countries.”

Another agenda is to create a police state. A police state can control people who object to their impoverishment for the benefit of the superrich much more easily than can a democracy endowed with constitutional civil liberties. 

Another agenda is to get rich. Terror plots, whether real or orchestrated, have created a market for security. Dual Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff, former head of US Homeland Security, is the lobbyist who represents Rapiscan, the company that manufactures the full body porno-scanners that, following the “underwear bomber” event, are now filling up US airports. Homeland Security has announced that they are going to purchase the porno-scanners for trains, buses, subways, court houses, and sports events. How can shopping malls and roads escape? Recently on Interstate 20 west of Atlanta, trucks had to drive through a similar device. Everyone has forgotten that the underwear bomber lacked required documents and was escorted aboard the airliner by an official.

The “war on terror” provides an opportunity for a few well-connected people to become very rich. If they leave Americans with a third world police state, they will be living it up in Gstaad.

This despite the fact that everyone on the planet knows that it is not lactating mothers, children, elderly people in walkers and wheelchairs, members of Congress, members of the military, nuns, and so on, who are members of Al Qaeda plotting to bring aboard a bomb in their underwear, their shoes, their shampoo and face creams.

Indeed, bombs aboard airliners are a rare event.

What is it really all about? Could it be that the US government needs terrorist events in order to completely destroy the US Constitution? On November 24, National Public Radiobroadcast a report by Dina Temple-Raston: “Administration officials are looking at the possibility of codifying detention without trial and are awaiting legislation that is supposed to come out of Congress early next year.” Of course, the legislation will not come out of Congress. It will be written by Homeland Security and the Justice (sic) Department. The impotent Congress will merely rubber-stamp it.

The obliteration of habeas corpus, the most necessary and important protection of liberty ever institutionalized in law and governing constitution, has become necessary for the US government, because a jury might acquit an alleged or mock “terrorist” or framed person whom the US government has declared prior to the trial will be held forever in indefinite detention even if acquitted in a US court of law. The attorney general of the United States has declared that any “terrorist” that he puts on trial who is acquitted by a jury will remain in detention regardless of the verdict. Such an event would reveal the total lawlessness of American “justice.”

The United States of America, “the city upon the hill,” “the light unto the world,” has become Nazi Germany. It was the practice of the Gestapo to ignore court verdicts and to execute or hold indefinitely the cleared defendant in the camps. The Obama regime is in the process of completing Dick Cheney’s dream by legislating the legality of indefinite detention. American law has collapsed to the dungeons of the Dark Ages.

This Nazi Gestapo policy is now the declared policy of the US Department of Justice (sic).

"The Demands of the Mujahideen" By Sheikh Abu Musa'b English

Five Types Of Abandonment Of The Qur’aan - by Ibn Al-Qayyim

O Muslims! O Believers of the Qur’aan! Beware you do not fall into those whom the Prophet (saw) will complain about to his Lord on the Day of Judgement:
“And the Messenger (will) say: O My Lord, indeed my people took this Qur’aan as something worthy of being abandoned.” [25:30]

The scholar, Ibn Al Qayyim Al-Jawziyyah (d. 758 AH) said; There are various types of “abandonment” of the Qur’aan:
1) To abandon listening to it and believing in it.
2) To abandon acting upon it, and ignoring its lawful and prohibited ordinances (halaal and haraam), even if one believes in it and recites it.
3) To abandon judging by it, and resorting to it as a judge when there are differences in the essence of the religion or other matters.
4) To abandon pondering over it, and understanding it, and seeking the explanation of it.
5) To abandon using it as a cure in all types of diseases of the heart, and instead to seek to cure these diseases by other means. 
And all of these categories are included in the statement of Allah:
“And the Messenger (will) say: O My Lord, indeed my people took this Qur’aan as something worthy of being abandoned.” [25:30]  
even though some of these types of abandonment are worse than others.

Sultan Abdul Hameed II & the collapse of the Ottoman Caliphate








Ruling on Behalf of the “National Interest” - A Brief History of US influence in the Gulf

With the release of the recent Wikileaks cables, it is apparent indeed the utter loyalty Arab regimes hold for the American Imperialists. However, understanding these relationships requires an analysis that understands that the Anglo-Empire of our age, was split after World War II into the financialized institutions of the City of London and their Wall Street creations which control global finance through international institutions and the American military which polices the world militarily on behalf of that financialized domination.  In this paper we look at the history of US foreign policy in the Gulf Region generally and analyze how the US took over as imperialist in the region.

Of course, a necessary distinction must be made when discussing America's role in the world... the American system of political economy, the system that built the country is something that was so successful it had  Arab populations desiring US intervention in the region as the World Wars ended. Unfortunately, that system was only meant for Western nations and the US embarked on ushering in the neo-imperialist order we see today. The only platform for Muslims today must be, the absolute removal of all military personnel and bases from majority-Muslim nations, the end of support for Israel and the complete removal of support for the authoritarian regimes. Once this is established then Americans could actually contribute to the world by redeveloping original systems that, while not perfect, did contribute to the advancement of humankind.  This is a distinction between empire (Sykes-Picot versus King-Crane), an important distinction interestingly understood by this political action movement below.


Were Muslims able to rid themselves of the traitors, develop stable Islamic political, social and economic systems and return Americans to their non-interventionist attitudes of years gone by, we can make this planet sing and peace and order can be achieved. Unfortunately, it is apparent the wheels of empire have been thrust forth and the momentum is too fierce to contain. The only other option is to continue to fight therefore to make Allah's Word supreme.

Monday, November 29, 2010

As’ad AbuKhalil, a professor of political science at California State University on Arab Regime Loyalty to US Master

Watch from 1:00

Moazzem Begg - "Doing the work for the U.S." - Wikileaks Cable

 NOTE: This post is not meant to attack anyone or belittle the work of CagePrisoners. It is only to question the value of condemning Muslims as terrorists and working alongside of the kuffar for "human rights," without calling to the necessity of the establishment of Allah's religion in the land and the annihilation of the invaders from Muslim soil. We were saddened as well to see CagePrisoners recently condemn their brother Anwar Awlaki as well, but this is not a new trend within the "Activist" community.

That being said, please read the whole post to understand the position and stance and that the comments made by the U.S. officials supporting the narrative of Moazzem Begg is only in regard to closing Guantanamo and encouraging European nations to accept prisoners. However, there is an important and fundamental distinction that should be identified in the conscious one's mind with regard to the difference between activism as false hope and change and as principled Islamic resistance to the entire system of kufr and Western imperialism.

Mr. Begg is doing our work for us, and his articulate, reasoned presentation makes for a convincing argument. It is ironic that after four years of imprisonment and alleged torture,
Moazzam Begg is delivering the same demarche to GOL as we are: please consider accepting GTMO detainees for resettlement. Despite Begg's optimism, the Prime and Foreign Ministers continue to publicly state that the GoL supports the closure of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility and stands ready to assist from a financial and logistical perspective, but cannot accept detainees for resettlement.




C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 LUXEMBOURG 000005

SIPDIS
DEPT FOR EUR/WE VALERIE BELON, S/GC MICHAEL WILLIAMS
AMEMBASSY ANKARA PASS TO AMCONSUL ADANA
AMEMBASSY ASTANA PASS TO AMCONSUL ALMATY
AMEMBASSY BERLIN PASS TO AMCONSUL DUSSELDORF
AMEMBASSY BERLIN PASS TO AMCONSUL LEIPZIG
AMEMBASSY BELGRADE PASS TO AMEMBASSY PODGORICA
AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PASS TO AMCONSUL ST PETERSBURG
AMEMBASSY ATHENS PASS TO AMCONSUL THESSALONIKI
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL VLADIVOSTOK
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL YEKATERINBURG

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/01/15
TAGS: PGOV KDRG PREL LU
SUBJECT: TO HELL AND BACK: GITMO EX-DETAINEE STUMPS IN LUXEMBOURG

REF: 09 LUXEMBOURG 328; 09 LUXEMBOURG 288; 09 LUXEMBOURG 302

CLASSIFIED BY: Adam Center, Consul; REASON: 1.4(B), (D)

1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Former Guantanamo Bay (GTMO) detainee
Moazzam Begg met with Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn 14 January
2010 to press the government of Luxembourg to accept GTMO detainees
for resettlement. Begg, a British citizen of Pakistani origin, was
arrested in Pakistan in 2002 and imprisoned in Kandahar, Bagram,
and Guantanamo Bay, before his release to Britain in 2005. In a
statement to RTL Television, Asselborn said that Luxembourg will do
what is possible and reiterated the government's position to
provide financial assistance, training and housing costs, and other
technical assistance. Consular officer attended an evening
screening of the documentary film "Taxi to the Dark Side," followed
by a Q&A session with Begg. When asked if he thought Luxembourg
will do more than contribute financially to the resettlement
efforts, Begg replied that he was "pleasantly surprised" with his
conversations with MFA officials and "hopeful." END SUMMARY

--------------------------------------------

AUDIENCE WITH FOREIGN MINISTER

--------------------------------------------

2. (C) Ex-GTMO detainee Moazzam Begg, released from
Guantanamo Bay in 2005, is barnstorming throughout Europe, pushing
governments to accept GTMO detainees for resettlement. Following
his release from GTMO, Begg created an NGO dedicated to this cause,
called Caged Prisoners. Representatives from two additional NGOs,
Reprieve and Center for Constitutional Rights, accompanied Begg on
his visit to Luxembourg. Luxembourg media coverage on the
Asselborn-Begg meeting was ubiquitous, but superficial. With
numerous reports that the meeting occurred, nearly all media
outlets were silent on the actual substance of the meeting. Only
Begg provided some limited insight into the outcome of the meeting.
Speaking later in the evening (see para 4), he responded to an
inquiry about the meeting by saying that "without giving anything
away," he was "pleasantly surprised" and "hopeful."

--------------------------------------------- -----------

ASSELBORN: "WE'LL HELP"/BEGG: "DO MORE"

--------------------------------------------- -----------

3. (C) In an interview following his meeting with Begg,
Asselborn avoided specifics of the discussion. He reiterated
Luxembourg's willingness to provide financial assistance to the
resettlement efforts - the GoL party line for many months.
Asselborn said, however, that he was in regular contact with
American officials, including Special Envoy Dan Fried, as recently
as last week. (See refs a and b on the Asselborn-Fried meeting in
September 2009 in Luxembourg and subsequent exchange of letters.)
In comments to the press following the meeting, Begg only explained
what the messages he delivered were - not how those messages were
received. Begg's primary message is that European governments have
to step up and accept some of the GTMO detainees for resettlement.
Begg, an articulate man, argued that there are dozens of prisoners
in GTMO just like him - not dangerous to society, able to
communicate and assimilate, able to be a contributing and
responsible member of society - and they just need governments to
stand up and offer them a place to call home. In an interview prior
to his meeting with Asselborn, Begg was asked if countries like
Luxembourg have a responsibility regarding ex-detainees. Begg
reportedly responded that it is a European tradition to offer
asylum to refugees, and that this tradition also should be extended
to former Guantanamo detainees who have not been convicted of
crimes, are not dangerous, and are deemed as releasable.

LUXEMBOURG 00000005 002 OF 003

----------------

TAXI TO HELL

----------------

4. (SBU) Begg later attended an Amnesty International-hosted
screening of 2007 Oscar Winner for Best Documentary "Taxi to the
Dark Side" (French translation of film title: "Taxi to Hell").
Conoff attended screening and Begg's Q&A session following the
film. The film, a harrowing depiction of alleged torture inside
Bagram, Abu Ghraib, and Guantanamo, was an undisguised attack on
the Bush Administration, focusing much of its venom on Former
Defense Secretary Rumsfeld and Former Vice President Cheney. Mr.
Begg, on the other hand, presented an image of "forgive, but never
forget," and has focused his attentions not on the ill treatment he
allegedly received, but on what can be done to resettle the
remaining "releasable" prisoners in Guantanamo Bay. Reporting
officer estimates 100-150 people attended the filming and Q&A
session and noted the complete absence of press, other diplomats,
or GoL officials.

--------------------------------------------- -

LOOKING FORWARD, NOT BACKWARD

--------------------------------------------- -

5. (C) During his presentation, Begg spoke almost
exclusively of the future, with hardly any mention of the past. He
did not discuss the question of legality of torture. Rather than
stressing past injustices, he focused on what to do now. He
acknowledged that he lives with the past, but that he now wants to
be part of the solution, and is working to convince Luxembourg and
other governments - and their populaces - to want the same.

---------------------------------------

LUXEMBOURGERS NOT SO SURE

---------------------------------------

6. (SBU) In a 90-minute Q&A session, Begg was asked, how
would ex-detainees fit in in Luxembourg. How would it work? Where
would they live? How would they be supported? The fear and
skepticism was palpable in the audience. Begg and his NGO cohorts
stressed that there were Algerians and Tunisians in GTMO who could
come to Luxembourg and speak French, one of Luxembourg's official
and most-commonly used languages. He stressed that neighboring
countries - France, Belgium, Portugal, Ireland - provided examples.
Begg even argued that if detainees could fit in in Palau, they
could do the same in Luxembourg. Begg deplored that certain people
believe the world is not big enough for the ex-detainees. He added
that if there were colonies on the Moon, "I'm sure they'd send us
there."

7. (SBU) Begg declined to speak about specific physical
transgressions against his person. When told how physically well
and mentally sound he appeared, he joked, "Well, I used to be
taller." Begg spoke articulately, demonstrating minimal ill will
toward his captors - even going so far as to say he speaks on the

LUXEMBOURG 00000005 003 OF 003

phone occasionally with his former interrogators. Consular officer
took note of the following exchange: Asked if he would ever
consider a return to the U.S., Begg replied that he had never been
to the U.S., but that the U.S. had come to him. Begg commented
that as a British citizen, he could travel to the U.S. without a
visa, but that he thinks he would need "a lot more than a visa to
get out."

-------------

COMMENT

-------------

8. (C) Mr. Begg is doing our work for us, and his articulate,
reasoned presentation makes for a convincing argument. It is
ironic that after four years of imprisonment and alleged torture,
Moazzam Begg is delivering the same demarche to GOL as we are:
please consider accepting GTMO detainees for resettlement. Despite
Begg's optimism, the Prime and Foreign Ministers continue to
publicly state that the GoL supports the closure of the Guantanamo
Bay detention facility and stands ready to assist from a financial
and logistical perspective, but cannot accept detainees for
resettlement.

9. (U) Please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moazzam_Begg
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxi_to_the_Dark _Side for
extensive information on Moazzam Begg and the film "Taxi to the
Dark Side."
Stroum